Tribunal de Apelaciones argentino falla unánimemente a favor del Reverendo Nakayama; la Corte Suprema confirma el fallo

Marzo 2026 – Los tribunales argentinos han emitido un fallo final y definitivo que reivindica plenamente al Reverendo Daisuke Nakayama respecto de todas las acusaciones formuladas en su contra. La Cámara Nacional de Apelaciones en lo Civil resolvió por unanimidad que no se había acreditado ningún tipo de conducta impropia por parte del
Reverendo, concluyó que había sido víctima de una campaña de difamación dañina e injustificada, y ordenó a la demandante indemnizarlo y publicar, a su propio costo, una notificación judicial del fallo. Posteriormente, La Corte Suprema de Justicia de la Nación Argentina confirmó esa decisión, dando por concluido el asunto en la máxima instancia judicial del país.

La Cámara llegó a estas conclusiones tras examinar íntegramente la prueba —incluyendo el testimonio de más de una docena de testigos, documentación y las propias comunicaciones escritas de la demandante— y concluyó que el Reverendo Nakayama se había conducido en todo momento con integridad, respeto y corrección. Las acusaciones formuladas en su contra fueron consideradas completamente infundadas.

El tribunal también determinó que la demandante había sometido al Reverendo Nakayama a una campaña pública sostenida y perjudicial —incluyendo ataques en redes sociales, manifestaciones públicas, grafitis, cobertura periodística y videos en línea— que causó un grave daño a su honor y reputación. En consecuencia, ordenó que le abonara una indemnización por los daños ocasionados y que publicara, a su propio costo, un resumen del fallo judicial.

En suma, el Reverendo Nakayama ha sido plenamente reivindicado por los tribunales de apelación en todas las instancias que examinaron este caso.

Argentine Appeals Court Rules Unanimously in Favor of Reverend Nakayama; SupremeCourt Confirms

March 2026 – Argentine courts have issued a final and definitive ruling fully vindicating Reverend Daisuke Nakayama of every allegation brought against him. The National Civil Court of Appeals ruled unanimously that no improper conduct of any kind had been established against the Reverend, found that he had been the victim of a damaging and unjustified defamation campaign, and ordered his accuser to pay him compensation and to publish a court-ordered notice of the judgment at her own expense. The Argentine Supreme Court has since confirmed that ruling, closing the matter at the highest judicial level in the country.


The appellate court reached these conclusions after examining the evidence in full — including the testimony of more than a dozen witnesses, documentary records, and the plaintiff’s own written communications — and found that Reverend Nakayama had at all times conducted himself with integrity, respect, and propriety. The allegations against him were found to be wholly unfounded.

The court also found that the plaintiff had subjected Reverend Nakayama to a sustained and damaging public campaign — including social media attacks, public demonstrations, graffiti, press coverage, and online videos — that caused serious harm to his honor and reputation. The court accordingly ordered her to pay him compensation for the damage inflicted, and to publish a summary of the judgment at her own expense.

In sum, Reverend Nakayama has been fully vindicated by the appellate courts at every level that examined this case.

Fallo arbitrario civil que reconoce que no se probó nada,  pero aplica indemnización por “abuso de poder  espiritual”. ¡Hemos apelado! 

En noviembre 22 el Juzgado Nacional en lo  Civil número 44 de CABA  dictó sentencia en la causa iniciada por Cecilia Califano contra el Reverendo Nakayama y  Nichiren Shoshu..

El juez reconoció que Califano no había probado  el supuesto abuso sexual que dijo haber sufrido,  ni tampoco ningún daño material ni psicológico. Sin embargo, dispuso una indemnización de un millón de pesos en concepto de daño espiritual por un supuesto “abuso de poder”, por el sólo hecho de que  el acusado es sacerdote. Lo hizo en base a una lectura arbitrara  de unos mensajes por WhatsApp, y sin atender a la abundante prueba presentada a favor del reverendo Nakayama o al hecho de que Califano se negó a realizar una prueba pericial psicológica, por ejemplo.

La sentencia carece de fundamentos jurídicos sólidos y no se basa en pruebas ni evidencias del expediente. 

El Reverendo Nakayama y The Nichiren Shoshu han apelado a la Cámara Civil  para que revoque la sentencia, por ser ella infundada y arbitraria. La sentencia no se apoya en ningún hecho que haya sido demostrado. Ser un líder espiritual o referente del culto no implica de por sí ninguna manipulación ni hostigamiento. Incluso  los mensajes utilizados por el Juez, lo que demuestran es la delicadeza y el cuidado del Reverendo en sus palabras y trato con la demandante y todos los creyentes.

La sentencia también rechaza la reconvención (contrademanda) del Reverendo Nakayama contra Califano por el daño que ella causó con sus calumnias, injurias, escraches y campañas de hostigamiento, diciendo que no han sido probadas, lo que contradice abundantes pruebas reunidas en el expediente.Confiamos que la Cámara Civil va a revertir esta injusta decisión, reconociendo la inocencia del Reverendo Nakayama y la conducta temeraria de la Sra. Califano.

Arbitrary civil ruling recognizes that nothing was proven, but applies compensation for “abuse of spiritual power”. We appealed!

On November 22, the National Civil Court number 44 of CABA issued a ruling in the case initiated by Cecilia Califano against the Reverend Nakayama and Nichiren Shoshu.

The judge acknowledged that Califano had not proven the alleged sexual abuse she said she had suffered, nor any material or psychological damage. However, he ordered compensation of one million pesos for spiritual damage for an alleged “abuse of power,” for the sole reason that the accused is a priest. He did so based on an arbitrary reading of WhatsApp messages, and without considering the abundant evidence presented in favor of the Reverend Nakayama or the fact that Califano refused to take a psychological expert test, for example.

The ruling lacks solid legal grounds and is not based on evidence or proof in the file.

The Reverend Nakayama and The Nichiren Shoshu have appealed to the Civil Court to revoke the ruling, as it is unfounded and arbitrary. The ruling is not based on any proven facts. Being a spiritual leader or a cult leader does not in itself imply any manipulation or harassment. Even the messages used by the Judge demonstrate the Reverend’s delicacy and care in his words and dealings with the plaintiff and all believers.

The ruling also rejects the counterclaim (countersuit) of the Reverend Nakayama against Califano for the damage she caused with her slander, libel, slander and harassment campaigns, saying that they have not been proven, which contradicts abundant evidence gathered in the file.

We trust that the Civil Court will reverse this unjust decision, recognizing the innocence of the Reverend Nakayama and the reckless conduct of Ms. Califano.

Court’s judgment will state the complete innocence of Rev. Nakayama for unfounded accusation

05-2023

In the civil trial, the evidentiary stage has been closed and the sentence is awaited. The Allegation to be presented by The Nichiren Shoshu and Reverend Nakayama prior to the judge’s ruling affirms that the fact invoked has not been proven, there is no investigation in Japan, thus we expect the court´s judgment will state the complete innocence of Rev. Nakayama for an unfounded accusation.

Nakayama and his lawsuit against Cecilia Califano

Califano cancelled her psychological expertise and does not want to undergo the expert examination. Close to the end of the testing stage, the sentence is awaited, which will surely reject Califano’s version.

The civil lawsuit against Cecilia Califano is for damages to the honor, image and dignity as well as to the very personal rights of Reverend Nakayama. The lawsuit is registered in the National Civil Court Number 44 of Capital Federal. The evidence has already been produced and the witnesses have testified in line of the truth set forth in Nakayama’s court brief.

Meanwhile, now Mrs. Califano gave up the psychological expertise that she had suggested as evidence; and does not want to submit to the expert examination.

Close to the end of the evidentiary stage, the sentence is awaited, which is estimated to reject Califano’s version, making room for the claim to safeguard the good name and honor, and to terminate the grievances with compensation for damages.

Nakayama y su demanda a Cecilia Califano

Califano desistió de la pericia psicológica y no quiere someterse al examen pericial. Próximos a finalizar la etapa de pruebas, se aguarda la sentencia que seguramente rechazará la versión de Califano.

El juicio civil a Cecilia Califano es por daños a la honra, imagen y dignidad como derechos personalísimos afectados del Reverendo Nakayama. El mismo tramita en el Juzgado Nacional en lo Civil 44 de Capital Federal. Ya se ha producido la prueba y los testigos han declarado en el sentido de la verdad expuesta en el escrito judicial de Nakayama. Mientras tanto, ahora la señora Califano desistió de la pericia psicológica que ella había sugerido como prueba; y no quiere someterse al examen pericial.
Ya próximos a que se clausure la etapa probatoria, se aguarda la sentencia que se estima rechazará la versión de Califano haciendo lugar a su reclamo para que se salvaguarde su buen nombre y honor, y se terminen los agravios con una indemnización por daños y perjuicios.

Reverend Nakayama innocent according to Court, that ordered the dismissal of the complaint

Buenos Aires, April 25. Ryokyu Nakayama, a Japanese citizen, priest in charge of Nichiren Shoshu in Argentina, a religion and institution recognized by the Argentine authorities, with 20-year experience in the Temple located in Avenida Carabobo 257, City of Buenos Aires, states as follows: “Cecilia Califano’s accusations against me are false and unfounded. My innocence was proved at court, thus safeguarding my good name and honor as well as the dignity of Nichiren Shoshu, also under attack. Ms. Califano will have to answer for the damages her actions have caused.”

The National Court of Appeals in Criminal and Correctional Matters in Buenos Aires, Argentina, has just confirmed the dismissal of Cecilia Califano’s complaint against me. This decision (the archive of the proceedings) is dated April 25, 2019 and not only corroborates that the accusation made by Califano was unjust and unfounded, but also strengthens the faith of Nichiren Shoshu Buddhist community.

On August 9, 2019, Federal Courts (Room 2 of the Criminal and Correctional Chamber) ordered the dismissal and filing of a case presented against me and our Temple by Mrs. Califano on human trafficking for sexual exploitation. Califano was insisting after Federal Court N° 1 had rule against her denounce.At that time, the Federal Chamber had ordered that further investigations be made giving Califano the opportunity to be heard in the Court and present evidence. The Court, after hearing the statement of Califano and other testimonies, again ordered the dismissal of the case and confirmed my innocence. The investigation had been exhausted without evidence of any crime.

This is what I call persecution. The use of Justice to offend, without any foundation, my dignity, the cult of Nichiren Shoshu and the community of believers.

Here the last page of the Court sentence:

View complete resolution

The two criminal cases initiated by Califano are terminated. The first case, opened in response to an abuse incident and has closed completely, and the second, initiated because of human trafficking and smuggling was terminated because the defendant was aquitted. In conclusion 2 district attorneys and 6 judges agreed that there was no crime to investigate, specifying that the prosecution did not afect the honor of  Reverend Nakayama.

How much longer will Califano be able to damage the reputation and honor of a dignified person dedicated to the Budhist religion? The civil justice has the answer in the case initiated by Reverend Nakayama against Cecilia Califano for damages and to end the defamation.

Reverendo Nakayama inocente según la Justicia, que ordenó el archivo de la causa

Buenos Aires, 25 de abril de 2019. Ryokyu Nakayama, ciudadano japonés, sacerdote responsable de Nichiren Shoshu de Argentina, religión e institución reconocida por las autoridades argentinas y con 20 años de presencia en el templo de Avenida Carabobo 257 CABA, manifiesta: “Las acusaciones de Cecilia Califano contra mi persona son falsas y sin ningún fundamento. En la Justicia fue probada mi inocencia y resguardado mi buen nombre y honor y la dignidad del culto de Nichiren Shoshu, también atacada. Califano deberá responder por los daños que sus actos ocasionan.”

La Cámara Nacional de Apelaciones en lo Criminal y Correccional con sede en Buenos Aires, Argentina, confirmó el 25 de abril de 2019 el archivo de la denuncia de Cecilia Califano. La decisión judicial corrobora que la denuncia de Califano contra Nakayama es injusta e infundada y fortalece la fe budista de la comunidad de Nichiren Shoshu. 


No contenta con la primera causa penal archivada, Califano me querelló en una segunda causa por captación de voluntades con fines de explotación, acusándome a mí y al Templo de “trata de personas”. El Juzgado Federal N°1 ordenó archivar la causa, Califano apeló el sobreseimiento. La Cámara dispuso que se hicieran nuevas investigaciones dándole la oportunidad a Califano de ser escuchada en el Tribunal y presentar pruebas. El Juzgado, luego de escuchar la declaración de Califano y otros testimonios, ordenó nuevamente el sobreseimiento y el archivo de la causa. Califano apeló otra vez y con fecha 9 de agosto de 2019, la Cámara Criminal y Correccional Federal – Sala 2 – confirmó mi inocencia y el archivo de la causa. La investigación había sido agotada sin pruebas de ningún delito.

A esto llamo persecución. El uso de la Justicia para ofender, sin ningún fundamento,  a mi dignidad, al culto de Nichiren Shoshu y a la comunidad de los creyentes. 

Aquí, la parte final de la sentencia de Cámara:

Ver resolución completa

Las dos causas penales iniciadas por Califano están definitivamente terminadas, una por supuesto abuso y la otra por trata de personas con sobreseimiento firme o sea en primera y segunda instancia se declaró la inocencia del Reverendo Nakayama. Básicamente, 2 fiscales y 6 jueces coincidieron en que NO HABÍA NINGÚN DELITO que investigar aclarando expresamente que la formación del sumario no afectó el buen nombre y honor del Reverendo Nakayama.

¿Nos preguntamos hasta cuándo Califano podrá seguir impunemente hostigando y dañando la imagen, el buen nombre y honor de una persona digna dedicada diariamente al culto budista? La justicia civil tiene ahora  la respuesta en la causa iniciada por el Reverendo Nakayama contra Cecilia Califano por daños y perjuicios y para que termine con su acoso difamatorio.

History of a persecution

My name is Ryokyu Nakayama. I am a Japanese citizen and the priest responsible for the Nichiren Shoshu Temple in Argentina. The Temple is located in Avenida Carabobo 257, City of Buenos Aires. I live with my wife and two daughters aged six and three in the building that serves both as temple and as practice and educational center. Nichiren Shoshu is an institution duly recognized by the State and registered at the National Registry of Religious Organizations. We have recently celebrated the 20th anniversary of the Temple’s opening in Argentina.

Since March 2018, a slander campaign against me, which also affects the Nichiren Shoshu Buddhist cult and the members attending our services and training school, has been spreading through the social networks and digital and printed media. I deeply regret the unrest these false accusations may cause both to the community and persons of good will.

I remained silent for several years to protect Ms. Cecilia Califano’s privacy. But this campaign and the harassment on the part of my accuser, Ms. Califano, has been escalating with demonstrations in the streets, offensive graffiti, posters, stone attacks to the temple, and messages in social networks, usually under fake profiles.

Who is Cecilia Califano? She is a believer who, for more than ten years, practised Buddhism, attending the Temple and the spiritual practice meetings at the regional groups, and expressed love feeling towards me, without any encouragement whatsoever on my part, stalking and harassing me persistently. I always declined her advances and was discreet when dealing with the situation to avoid hurting her feelings and exposing her before the members of the community. Nonetheless, my tactfulness exasperated Ms. Califano, who decided to organize a campaign to tarnish my reputation.

The setup: a script with false events

Ms. Califano states that I abused her on July 25, 2017, at a hotel in Japan, during a believers’ pilgrimage to the Head Temple. That night, at her request, I accompanied her to buy some special kitchen knives. We bought them, then she wanted to have something to eat and afterwards we returned to the hotel because everybody was returning to Buenos Aires the following day. On such occasion, she declared her love feelings towards me. I rejected her declaration with care so as not to hurt her. Nonetheless, the following days she started telling me that I had hurt her by taking advantage of her feelings. I would like to state that the subsequent abuse accusation is absolutely false and a slander. Moreover, in June 2018, an anonymous complaint on human trafficking against me and the Temple was filed with the Federal Prosecutor. After a thorough investigation, this complaint was dismissed in court. However, Ms. Califano appeared as plaintiff and requested the case to be reopened. In her sworn statement, apart from the abuse, she declared that after shopping in Japan, I took her, under threats, to the areas where prostitution is exercised where she was exhibited to some men. Obviously, such statements are false. All the members who have participated in the trips to Japan organized by the Temple, including Ms. Califano, may attest that such activities never took place. To this date, she is the only plaintiff regarding the human trafficking case. In her sworn statement, she also declared that I visited brothels. This is absolutely false and serious. Five days after the events she had reported, I received a message from her expressing her love feelings towards me.

I must add that, a month later, when I travelled to Córdoba to fulfill my spiritual duties, Ms. Califano travelled on her own and participated in the programmed events and ceremonies. Although she stayed at a female believer’s home who hosted her, she insisted on getting accommodation at the same hotel I was staying. On the day I was returning to Buenos Aires, she decided to board the same bus I was travelling on, instead of using the plane ticket she had previously bought for a later date. On the day of my birthday, in August, she sent me a kimd message wishing me a happy birthday. During September and October, she asked my opinion on several issues related to her role in the Temple. Our exchange was always correct and respectful. Three months after the alleged abuse, she expressed pity and sadness because I would not attend, along with other Buddhist mates, to a meeting to be held at her home.

Ms. Califano continued her spiritual practice normally until the end of October 2017, attending the Temple and displaying a personal and social behavior which was inconsistent with the behavior of a person that had been assaulted or abused. How is it possible for a person who was abused and exhibited to men for human trafficking purposes, as she claims, to behave in such manner before me and her colleagues?

I have already submitted those messages to the court. Moreover, many people can testify in relation to the aforementioned behavior of Ms. Califano during my stay in Córdoba, for example, the interpreter that travelled with me from Buenos Aires.

I would also wish to state that Ms. Califano is spreading a fake story about a non-existing person who claims to have been abused by me in a center where I practise sports, aiming at amplifying the case by tarnishing my honor. At the court’s request, Ms. Califano expressed that it was difficult to locate this person bacause she did not know her personally. Moreover, when learning about this complaint, the sports center’s manager immediately posted, in the blog that had released the news, that such person did not exist as a member of the institution, neither had attended it. Unfortunately, the blog’s owner deleted the message.

Reckless and malicious conduct

Ms. Califano also states that, after lodging her complaint, she was ill-treated by some colleagues and expelled. I must make it clear that this not true, since she herself decided to quit her Buddhist practice and communicated this to me via a Whatsapp message. However, me and several members received insulting and threatening messages and phone calls. Also, due to this slander campaign, we have become aware of comments in social networks publications inciting violence, such as: “set the temple on fire”, and repeated threats to me displaying profound bigotry.

In this respect, my family and the members of our religious community are really frightened by Ms. Califano’s actions so far. I deeply regret the suffering she is causing. At this moment, her aggressive and violent campaign prevents the Temple and its worshipers from enjoying a normal religious practice in a peaceful, free and tranquil social environment.

I would also wish to clearly express that abuse, whether psychological or physical, is always a despicable and repulsive act, no matter the circumstances.

Steps taken to confront discredit

Since the aggressions are increasing and nothing seems to stop Ms. Califano’s behavior, I have been forced to take formal measures (sending a return receipt letter; filing a misdemeanor complaint with the Buenos Aires City Prosecutor’s Office; a civil mediation, which Ms. Califano failed to attend), but to no avail. Presently, I have filed a civil complaint against Ms. Califano to stop her defamatory conduct, to publicly retract, to refrain from reproducing her unfounded slanderous and libelous allegations, and to pay for the damages inflicted. I must safeguard the inalienable right to my good name and integrity, honor and dignity, as well as Nichiren Shoshu’s cult and religious freedom.

About Nichiren Shoshu

Nichiren Shoshu is a Buddhist school founded more than 750 years ago in Taisekiji, Japan. It has 1086 priests, 698 temples in Japan and 33 distributed in the United States of America, Canada, Spain, France, Hong Kong, Singapore, Korea, and Brazil. It comprises 700,000 members and has been established in Argentina since 1960. The Temple located in Flores was opened in 1998. Nichiren Shoshu spreads worldwide the correct teachings of Nichiren Daishonin, for each individual’s joy as a starting point to achieve eternal world peace. Regarding the Spanish-speaking countries in South America, there are believers in Argentina, Chile, Peru, Uruguay and Bolivia, all centered at the Temple located in Argentina, where worship and educational activities are constantly conducted.
http://www.nichirenshoshu.or.jp/index.html